Corporate Sites Blogs

RSS is the ultimate opt-in

December 1st, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

If you haven’t heard about RSS yet, you need to check it out! RSS (Really Simple Syndication) is a standard designed for syndicating headlines and other web content to other websites. It has evolved into a popular means for individuals to keep up with the latest articles and musings across favorite websites — using RSS newsreader software (which is starting to get built into web browsers and email clients). RSS is widely used in blogs (including this one — just check the RSS link on the bottom right column) and on news sites such as the BBC and CNN.

RSS, in my opinion, has the power to turn email marketing on its head. RSS represents a separate web-delivered channel that, quite unlike email, is impossible to spam. If the subscriber doesn’t add your RSS feed to his or her newsreader software or web-based news aggregator (like My Yahoo!), then you can’t break through to him or her. What a brilliant idea! I think it’s inevitable that most newsletters and promotional content will eventually be delivered through RSS feeds rather than to our email in-boxes. The overload of spam is driving many consumers to RSS as a secure and unspamable way of getting news and commentary. And, as David Sklar opines, RSS will hopefully become the standard for companies to actually conduct real business with their customers. David is spot-on when he calls RSS the “ultimate opt-in.”

Spread the word: delicious this:RSS is the ultimate opt-in digg this:RSS is the ultimate opt-in spurl this:RSS is the ultimate opt-in furl this:RSS is the ultimate opt-in reddit this:RSS is the ultimate opt-in Add to Y!:RSS is the ultimate opt-in

Wisconsin Metal Tech

December 1st, 2004

Wisconsin Metal Tech screenshotWisconsin Metal Tech needed a new website that offered easy access to an extensive range of industrial metal products in an appealing and search engine optimal site. Netconcepts incorporated content from the existing three sites into one redesigned site, developing a coherent site structure that organized the content logically. This content was then represented within an appealing look and feel which reflected Wisconsin Metal Tech’s new corporate colors. Search engines and customers alike now have easy access to the steel product they are looking for.

[ database | client admin cms | SEO ]

Visit The Site: Wisconsin Metal Tech

Fletcher Construction

September 1st, 2004

Flectcher Construction screenshotFletcher Construction came to Netconcepts with a site design that needed to be built in a way that reflected best practice. They also needed a site that incorporated content management tools, equiping them to update their large portfolio of work and provide a timely insight into the business. Netconcepts developed the supplied design in a Web optimal form, offering a responsive (fast-downloading) insight into Fletcher’s rich history and contemporary successes.

[ database | client admin cms | SEO ]

Visit The Site: Fletcher Construction

Yahoo! & Google’s overlaping results fewer than you’d think

August 29th, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

There’s a brand new meta search engine on the block called Jux2. Its premise is to find the overlap between the top 10 results across two major search engines. So far I’m really impressed with it. It even has a toolbar for Mozilla FireFox.

Jux2 conducted some tests to determine just how much overlap there is in the top search results on Google versus Yahoo! The results of their tests are very interesting. Such as:

  • Analysis of Google and Yahoo! search results on the 500 most popular search terms found that, on average, Google and Yahoo! shared only 3.8 of their top 10 results. Furthermore, 30% of the search terms had 2 or fewer overlapping terms, and only 17% had 6 or more overlapping results among the top 10.
  • The overlapping set of top 10 results between Google and Ask Jeeves was even smaller: 3.4 out of 10. And between Yahoo! and Ask Jeeves, smaller yet: 3.1 out of 10.
  • Analysis of 91 random searches on Google and Yahoo! found that the two engines share only 23% of their top 100 results. Furthermore, only 4.8 of Google’s top 10 results even made Yahoo’s top 100. And only 5.4 of Yahoo’s top 10 made Google’s top 100.

For me, Jux2’s findings were a good reminder that the algorithms of the major search engines are markedly different, more so than one might imagine. So a metasearch engine that compares and contrasts two partially overlapping sets of search results makes a lot of sense. I think I’ll try Jux2 for a while and report back on my experiences.

Spread the word: delicious this:Yahoo! & Google's overlaping results fewer than you'd think digg this:Yahoo! & Google's overlaping results fewer than you'd think spurl this:Yahoo! & Google's overlaping results fewer than you'd think furl this:Yahoo! & Google's overlaping results fewer than you'd think reddit this:Yahoo! & Google's overlaping results fewer than you'd think Add to Y!:Yahoo! & Google's overlaping results fewer than you'd think

Web content really IS critical!

August 26th, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

Today I had the pleasure to hear web content guru Gerry McGovern speak at a full-day workshop in Wellington, New Zealand. He’s got to be one of the very best speakers I’ve ever heard! His course material, his sense of humor, his thought-provoking insights, and especially his Irish accent — had everyone in the audience mesmerized. Here’s a sampling of the day’s take-aways:

  • Action vs. reaction: If a site visitor’s action results in a reaction from your web site that has a wait time exceeding that of the action, the visitor will become frustrated. That frustration will build as more . For example, clicking on the File menu tab only takes a second, so the time it takes for the menubar to appear underneath should take no more than a second.
  • 80/20 rule of content: For many sites, less than 20% of the site content accounts for over 80% of the pageviews. With Microsoft.com it was 1% of their content accounted for 99% of the pageviews. In fact, 35% of their pages had never been viewed! That’s well over a million pages of content that people at Microsoft worked hard to write ? for nothing. Focus your efforts on the copy that will be read, not on the copy that won’t.
  • Columns: Readers use their peripheral vision to keep track of the beginning of the next line down while they are reading across a line. So with text that has a long linewidth, it becomes difficult to read. Gerry recommends a three column format, with 20% or so of the width going to the first column (use this column for navigation), 60% or so dedicated to the middle column, and another 20% or so for the right hand column.
  • Call for action: Always end your pages with a clear action for the reader to take. Never leave the reader hanging, wondering what to do next. The center column at the end of the body copy is a critical piece of real estate for these calls for action.
  • Links in copy: According to Gerry, links in the middle of body copy distracts the readers making it difficult for them to read the paragraph, and it connotes “hey, click on me… the rest of this text is really boring!” Instead of embedding links within the body copy, consider using the right hand column for the related links. If there are important links there that take the reader to the “next step,” also repeat them at underneath the body copy in the center column.
  • Simplicity: Einstein purportedly was quoted as saying “Everything should be made as simple as possible, but no simpler.” Apply this idea to your web copy. Keep your copy as short and simple as possible. People tend not to read long copy on the web. With a 300 word page, 50% will read it to the end; 500 words, 20%; 1000 words, 5%. Gerry recommends headings of 4 to 8 words, summaries of 30 to 50 words, sentences of 15 to 20 words, and paragraphs of 40 to 70 words.
  • “Kill your darlings”: William Faulkner once said this. If there’s a particular expression or way of saying something that you’re particularly fond of, delete it from your copy, because you’re probably overusing it.

Gerry covered so much more than this, but it would take a book to cover it all. Oh, wait a minute… there is a book covering it all. Buy Gerry’s book, Content Critical.

Spread the word: delicious this:Web content really IS critical! digg this:Web content really IS critical! spurl this:Web content really IS critical! furl this:Web content really IS critical! reddit this:Web content really IS critical! Add to Y!:Web content really IS critical!

Spiders like Googlebot choke on Session IDs

June 25th, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

Many ecommerce sites have session IDs or user IDs in the URL of their pages. This tends to cause either the pages to not get indexed by search engines like Google, or to cause the pages to get included many times over and over, clogging up the index with duplicates (this phenonemon is called a “spider trap”). Furthermore, having all these duplicates in the index causes the site’s importance score, known as PageRank, to be spread out across all these duplicates (this phenonemon is called “PageRank dilution”).

Ironically, Googlebot regularly gets caught in a spider trap while spidering one of its own sites - the Google Store (where they sell branded caps, shirts, umbrellas, etc.). The URLs of the store are not very search engine friendly: they and are overly complex, and include session IDs. This has resulted in 3,440 duplicate copies of the Accessories page and 3,420 copies of the Office page, for example.

If you have a dynamic, database-driven website and you want to avoid your own site becoming a spider trap, you’ll need to keep your URLs simple. Try to avoid having any ?, &, or = characters in the URLs. And try to keep the number of “parameters” to a minimum. With URLs and search engine friendliness, less is more.

Spread the word: delicious this:Spiders like Googlebot choke on Session IDs digg this:Spiders like Googlebot choke on Session IDs spurl this:Spiders like Googlebot choke on Session IDs furl this:Spiders like Googlebot choke on Session IDs reddit this:Spiders like Googlebot choke on Session IDs Add to Y!:Spiders like Googlebot choke on Session IDs

SecureWorks

April 1st, 2004

by Stephan Spencer

SecureWorks screenshotWe are helping, network security specialist, SecureWorks revamp www.secureworks.com to make it search engine optimal in design, content and structure and insure maximum visibility in search engines like Google.

The first phase of the project is complete with the new-look, fast-loading site in place. And we are now working with SecureWorks, helping them search engine optimize content and achieve targeted visibility around the keywords our research identified.

[ static SSI | SEO ]

Visit The Site: Secure Works

Vector Electricity Network

December 1st, 2003

Vector Electricity  screenshotVector Electricity Network needed to introduce themselves and their services to distinctive markets with particular concerns. Netconcepts took their content and presented it in a compelling and search engine optimal website that caters to these audiences. We also provided Vector with the tools they need to make the site a cost effective marketing tool, with Vector staff able to edit and update content through a user-friendly and robust content management system.

[ database | client admin cms | SEO ]

Visit The Site: Vector Electricity Network
Further Work For This Client: Vector Gas Portfolio, Pure Energy Portfolio and Vector Networks Portfolio Page

Vector Networks

December 1st, 2003

Vector Networks screenshotVector Networks needed to provide potential investors and interested parties with easy access to company information. Easily managed and updated via a user-friendly content management system, Vectornetworks.co.nz provides up to date insight into the networks company in a search engine optimal form and offers the company a cost effective communications tool.

[ database | client admin cms | SEO ]

Visit The Site: Vector Networks
Further Work For This Client: Vector Gas Portfolio, Pure Energy Portfolio and Vector Electricity Networks Portfolio

How to survive web host failure

January 15th, 2002

Originally published in New Zealand Herald

Having just spent US$250,000 on an e-commerce system, the cosmetics company heard the news. Three weeks after their site going live, they would lose everything because the ASP was using leased hardware. These mistakes can be avoided if companies follow some basic principles says Stephan Spencer, President of Netconcepts.

Continue reading »

Spread the word: delicious this:How to survive web host failure digg this:How to survive web host failure spurl this:How to survive web host failure furl this:How to survive web host failure reddit this:How to survive web host failure Add to Y!:How to survive web host failure

Pages (11): « First ... « 7 8 9 [10] 11 »


Related tags

and/or

Newsletter

Web marketing virtuoso Stephan Spencer, shares a wealth of emarketing experience and hard-hitting, practical advice in our monthly newsletter. It's full of valuable insights...You should subscribe.








Latest posts
Latest comments


Contact Us

HEADQUARTERS
2820 Walton Commons West, Suite 123
Madison, WI 53718 USA
Phone: (608) 285-6600
Toll-free: 888 207-1109

REGIONAL OFFICE
36 Anzac Rd., Browns Bay
Auckland, New Zealand
Phone: (+64) 9 476-4601
infodesk@netconcepts.com